It's been a good year for 6.5 mm. The .260 Remington has hit full stride after a ramp-up of several years, with top competitors at most field-style long-range matches shooting it. Lapua's 6.5x47 saw the first wave of custom LR rifles built around it in 2007 and proved to be just as good as people hoped. Finally, Hornady is announcing its new 6.5 Creedmoor cartridge at SHOT 2008. How do these three mid-size 6.5 mm cartridges stack up against one another? I spent much of 2007 figuring out the answer to that question.
Why 6.5 mm ?
Shooters who compete in "practical"
rifle matches have been migrating to 6.5 mm calibers for several years. While "tactical"
shooters can be a dogmatic bunch, often sticking to conventional choices like .308 and .300
Winchester Magnum, practical competitors are in it to win, and the advantages of the lightweight but
high-BC 6.5 mm bullets didn't escape their notice. The long-range practical matches I've shot and
administered in the last five years have common themes of physical exertion, shooting from weird
positions under time stress, and difficult UKD targets.
To match the BC of the 6.5 mm 139-gr Lapua Scenar (#2 from left, 0.615), the .30 has to step up the 210-gr Berger VLD (#3 from left, 0.631). Also shown: .30 175-grain SMK (left, 0.496) and the .338 250-grain Lapua Scenar (right, 0.675). But 6.5 mm is not just a range toy. The 6.5x55 mm Swede has a long history in hunting in Europe, and it sufficient to take moose if shots are chosen carefully. These new 6.5's can duplicate the classic 6.5x55 loads, so with the right bullet selection, they can get the job done on game. This article isn't intended to sell 6.5 mm or to give a thorough account of each of the three calibers. I aim to explain how the three cartridges were tested and the summary of the results I was able to achieve with each one. I recommend reading the full articles for more background. |