From improvised shooting positions, such as over the roof of this CUCV, the low recoil of the 6.5x47
rounds helps speed subsequent target engagements.
The second big match I shot the 6.5x47 rifle at was the 2007 Camp Guernsey Invitational Multi-Gun
Match, put on by Colorado Multi-Gun at the National Guard base near Guernsey, Wyoming. This was a
match for long-range rifle, carbine, and pistol, with carbine targets to 330 yards and rifle targets
to 700 yards. Thirty-eight shooters competed through seven "run and gun" stages, including one
night stage, over two days in the terrain of the base. An accurate rifle, rock-solid data, and the
light-recoiling 6.5x47 helped me dominate one of the two long-range stages, giving me the match
points for an overall win.
Getting right to the point, does the 6.5x47 Lapua offer anything over regular .260 Remington? The
ballistics are nearly identical, considering normal variation from gun to gun, and the 6.5x47 Lapua
does it with just a few less grains of powder. The small-primer 6.5x47 Lapua brass handles pressure
better than most .260 brass. Many .260 shooters are giving rave reviews of the new Nosler Custom
.260 Remington brass, but it's $0.90 a piece. Remington's .260 brass is only $0.30 a piece, but
many have reported consistency issues with it, and that is consistent with my experience. Brass for
the 6.5x47 Lapua is about $0.65 a piece. Finding excellent brass has been the monkey on .260's
back, and this is the most compelling reason to go with the 6.5x47 Lapua. My impression is that to
drive the same bullet at the same velocity in both calibers, the 6.5x47 Lapua load will have higher
pressure; however, the Lapua brass seems to be able to handle that pressure just fine.
Shooting the 123-grain Lapua Scenars from his Accuracy International AW rechambered to 6.5x47 Lapua,
the author only had one rifle miss at the Camp Guernsey Invitational Multi-Gun.
|