Which rifle is better? There is no definitive answer. Both rifles shoot so well at extreme ranges that their accuracy is limited only by the shooter's data-book, wind-call, and ability to hold the cross-hairs steady while pressing the trigger. The TRG-42 is lighter and easier to carry, however, if both rifles were run over by a truck and I had to make a critical shot, I would choose the AWSM; it's the tougher rifle. For the money, the TRG-42 is cheaper at $4018 for the rifle with bipod and muzzle brake, compared to $5530 for an AWSM configured the same way.

* The author would like to thank Janne Pohjoispaa and Ray Sanchez for assistance with this article.

* TABLE 1

		AI-AWSM		         TRG-42

Caliber	        .338 Lapua Magnum        .338 Lapua Magnum

Weight		15.1 lbs		 11.25 lbs

Overall Length  48.5 inches		 47.25 inches    

Barrel Type	Stainless,		 Cold-hammer forged
		Cut-rifled 5R		 

Barrel Length	27 inches		 27.125 inches

Twist		1:11			 1:12

Magazine	5-round single-stack     5-round double-stack
		single-feed		 single-feed

Action		60-degree bolt		 60-degree bolt

Although the two rifles have stark cosmetic differences, their designs are remarkably similar.

The .338 Lapua splits the difference between .50 BMG and .308 Winchester. Left to right: .50 BMG, .338 Lapua, .308 Winchester, 5.56 NATO.